• Search
    Latest News
  • Bunkering


    This issue may look as bad as ever with a bay littered with countless tankers and regular, if small, incidents, but things here are definitely on the move! Most positively the Gibraltar Port is engaged in numerous layers of improvement and upgrade, both at an administrative level and practical/physical.

    &nbsp:

    Monitoring will take a gigantic leap also with the installation of state of the art VTS technology backed up by look out towers. What is also impressive is that better political relations under the Tripartite Forum will enable the Gib and Algeciras Port to get on with their important work of co-operation for the safe navigation and monitoring of vessels in real time. Once all these systems are up and running Tangiers will then be targeted to rope that authority into the triangle of management of ships throughout the entire strait area. Great news, if we have to have the level of ship activity in the Bay it has to be supported by adequate monitoring systems and co-operation.

    &nbsp:

    Outstanding and important to local residents is the question of vapour recovery technology, or VRT. GSD Govt had talked about bringing ship to ship transfers onto land thereby reducing the risk of collision with potentially catastrophic consequences. A further advantage was the opportunity of then installing VRT to a new land based set up



    Fumes from Bunkering Barges


    While fumes from bunkering activities have thankfully lessened over the last 12 months, recent events have prompted the ESG to publicly state its concerns once again.

    After having received complaints from various members of the public on the 9th and 10th July, and having investigated the issue, we found that the preferred practice of berthing barges at the detached mole had been inexplicably reversed with barges berthing once again at the Extension Jetty, close to densely populated residential areas.

    Searing temperatures during hot summer months can cause any fuel to quickly vaporise, often resulting in foul smells throughout neighbourhoods such as Varyl Begg, EuroPlaza and Westview Park.

    The ESG received calls from these areas with complaints of nausea, and concerns over the source and impact of the foul smells. The group directed the callers to lodge a complaint with the Environmental Agency whose environmental monitors are accessible after hours via the police station. The ESG also contacted the agency in writing about these complaints and was advised that a follow up had been carried out and recommendations made to the Port by the agency on its findings.

    This situation has also brought to light the difficulty, at times, in reaching those within the port with responsibility to address these intolerable situations as they arise. It further raises the need for investment by the bunkering industry into technologies like vapour recovery to prevent any fumes from escaping into the atmosphere.

    The ESG calls upon Government to review this situation and ensure that it’s publicly stated preferred policy: to remove bunkering barges from the extension jetty is upheld.



    ESG on Bunkering fumes Emergency Hotline


    Summer is here and along with the good weather is a resurgence of noxious smells from bunkering activity. This has resulted in a number of complaints received by the ESG. It is important that the public knows that Minister Joe Holliday has advised the ESG of a 24 hour hotline number 79028 to be called by the public to report all such incidents.

    The ESG urges everyone to make a note of the number and to please call when affected by bunkering fumes and register the problem as it occurs to enable proper investigations to be done. Please continue to call or email the ESG who is also keeping records of such incidents.

    Official hotline number: Bunkering Superintendent Tel: 79028



    Bunkering and vapour recovery systems


    The recent report of the possible expansion in bunkering in Gibraltar is met with concern by the ESG. For nearly two years now the group has both publicly and directly in correspondence with Government, been making its concerns known over the impact that present levels of bunkering is having on air quality in Gibraltar especially in some residential and recreation areas.

    In a matter of only a few years, local bunkering operations has mushroomed by 168% (according to Govt own statistics) creating an already highly congested Bay. Some of these operations regularly produce offensive fumes which could also be harmful to people. While Government has sought to reassure the ESG and the public about the harmless nature of the gases released during bunkering, the data asked for by the group has not yet been made available.

    Given the impacts that are felt from bunkering it would seem that the Gibraltar Bunkering Code of Practice alone is not sufficient to provide best practice. The ESG has been asking Government to insist that operators apply best available technology and incorporate vapour recovery systems at key points of fuel transfer (on and off shore) to eliminate fugitive gases. It is understood that such technologies are already operational in countries where environmental matters are taken more seriously such as Norway, Holland and the USA.

    Undoubtedly financial investment into these technologies would be required by the operators, which, incidentally, would also recover otherwise lost product and could be seen as an economic benefit. Given the planned expansion and increase in profits it would be timely for all operators to invest in such available technology eliminating air pollution from its practices. This would provide a safer and healthier environment for our children to grow up in too.

    In light of the possibility of increased bunkering activity and the growing complaints received by the ESG, the group will be addressing the following issues at its first opportunity:-

    – The existing overload on the environment
    – The raising of the risk threshold with an ever more congested Bay
    – The need for vapour recovery systems
    – Containment of fugitive fumes at every stage of fuel transfer given the proximity to dwellings and to built up areas



    Open letter about bunkering pollution


    Public letter to Minister Holliday
    Wednesday 29th March 2006

    Dear Sir,

    The ESG and GONHS welcome your statement in the House last week on noxious smells from bunkering activity, acknowledging the problem that we and others in the community have been raising for some time. These “smells” contain hydrogen sulphide and benzene among other chemicals. Recent studies conclude that long term exposure to these chemicals even in low concentrations can cause serious health problems.

    Your statement claimed that at all times emissions have been within the law. Could we have publication of the monitoring data which supports this statement for hydrogen sulphide in particular, given that our air monitoring station does not include this chemical as a pollutant?

    This matter is of particular relevance given that on the 17th and 25th March the ESG received many complaints and reports of gas smells both in the South and town areas. The 25th was 3 days after your statement at the House whereby you claimed that measures had been set in place to sort the problem out and that you believed it was now resolved.

    We reiterate our concerns that these fumes are potentially harmful and that your Government has to ensure that the best available technology is applied to control and minimise these from recurring.

    Given the continuation of these noxious fumes affecting our residential areas, the ESG and GONHS ask the Minister: Are other preventative measures being considered?

    Due to the public importance of this matter we are copying this letter to the media.

    Sincerely,

    Environmental Safety Group and the Gibraltar Ornithological and Natural History Society



    ESG comment on Bunkering


    The ESG wholeheartedly supports GONHS in its call for the bunkering operators to respond to the complaints made by the public of the fuel oil stench that has been invading certain areas of Gibraltar for close to a year.

    The ESG considers that the huge volumes of fuel oil that are transhipped on a daily basis in Gibraltar (latest figures quoted of 4 million tonnes per year and growing) represent a serious potential health-risk to the population. Even if there is no spillage, the gases released during a bunkering operation include benzene (a known carcinogen which can trigger leukaemia) amongst other chemicals which cause irritation and disease.

    The group believes that the government and the industry need to work together to ACTIVELY protect the public from any exposure to these harmful gases. The current ongoing situation, whereby residents across the whole western side of Gibraltar are sporadically “gassed” is totally unacceptable.

    In its efforts to safeguard the health of residents, the ESG is launching a new “Clean bunkering” campaign which will involve:-

    i) Consulting the management of all local bunkering companies and the relevant government ministers and officials (Port and Environment) to find and implement measures that will reduce the public health impact to an absolute minimum
    ii) Taking air samples as necessary in response to complaints from the public
    iii) Providing relevant facts and figures in order to raise public awareness of the gases released during bunkering and of their direct effect on health

    The ESG hopes that a public demonstration will not be necessary but is prepared to organise this if the situation does not improve without further delay.



    BUNKERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS IN GENERAL


     

    BUNKERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS IN GENERALThe ESG

     

    Regard the recent criticisms from Spain on the Wilmington and Gibraltar’s general environmental record as generally inaccurate. It is a pity, however, that Gibraltar only seems to take environmental matters seriously when having to comply with European Directives but is not seen to go out of its way in providing best possible standards and safeguards for our local community and environment.

     

    The Wilmington, having replaced Vemamagna, is evidently not the best choice of replacement as the latest IMO seaworthiness report shows. The Minister of the Port should give an account of his understanding of this matter that has caused some confusion within the media. The ESG would like to know if our Government is aware of the substandard report being referred to in media reports that show that the Wilmington suffers from various deficiencies and asks what is their position on this matter? The Women’s Association together with the ESG and others are voicing their concern for a professional and sensitive solution to be found for a problem that fuels both politicised criticism from our Spanish neighbours while also presenting growing unease in implications for our environment and health.

     

    The ESG is also extremely concerned by the recent admission from the Junta de Andalusia that there exist 4 breaches of environmental directives with regard to outfall from the La Linea area into our Bay. Can our Government and Environment Agency look into this further and establish what laws are being breached as this could be jeopardising our health and safety.

     

     



    As Gas Venus leaves and a milestone reached re THAT oil spill yet another minor spill occurs in the Port area. 13.08.23


    ZERO IMPACT MEANS ZERO OIL

    Sunday 13th August 2023

    As the first milestone in the Rosia oil clean up is reached, with round the clock efforts in place to save the coastline stepping down to a more moderate level, news has filtered through of a very minor oil spill from a bunkering barge within the harbour itself. As far as we can tell not much detail has been published such as the barge company involved, qty of spill and most importantly why did it happen? One would think that after this most recent bunkering oil spill debacle that extra care would be ordered from top down to ensure efforts were doubled to avoid such accidents? Was this also negligence one asks? Will fines follow?

    The ESG would also like to correct the statements being made of the zero impact of this latest in the run of oil spills. Zero impact means zero oil.

    As an NGO that has followed the evolution of shipping and bunkering in Gibraltar the group has pressed for best technology and practice to be followed to protect the environment and eliminate air/noise and marine pollution to the least possible.

    While some of these targets are being achieved, there is no doubt that much more needs to be done, and done quickly, to review why these incidental spills keep happening. The public should be told of the bunkering firms involved in selling the fuel along with whatever vessel is being serviced when an incident occurs. The ESG also believes the Port must exercise greater physical presence over the multiple bunkering operations going on in our waters as the ultimate authority for Pollution Prevention and Control. We would also insist that the industry is large enough to fund dedicated bunker inspectors to ensure standards by all operators are being adhered to during all transactions.

    Bunkering is not only an economic pillar for Gibraltar. It is also a major multi million profit making business for the owners. As such, when mistakes are made, and spills occur, we think that huge fines must be given to all to ensure changes are made on the ground and tighter controls are put in place to act as serious deterrent. Instead we see some fines, clean up costs covered, a few local companies and departments working frantically to save our environment while bunkering continues, until the next one.

    We need change.



    ESG reacts to latest Oil Spill 01.08.23


    News of yet another oil spill of heavy fuel oil is just what no one wanted to hear given the recent and successful departure of the OS35 – although even this vessel may still return to the Rock due to bad weather.

    While details are still emerging it appears the spill came from a ship receiving bunker. It was an accident that should not have happened, given it was during a normal procedure, and the ESG asks why the spill occurred and what level of oversight was in place at the time. Given ship-to-ship bunkering is conducted 24/7 this rings alarm bells for all checks to be reviewed.

    The thick, heavy fuel oil stated by the Port to have been released into our marine environment is toxic and will not evaporate – it will affect marine and bird life and will impact the coastline wherever it lands.

    Indeed we have seen 3 beaches closed today: Rosia, Camp and Little Bay. In the peak of our summer any beach closure will also cause much frustration to our citizens given the searing temperatures we have at present.

    That the polluter must pay for ecological damage goes without saying but the ESG would like to see an investigation into this oil spill and awaits further information on the scale and volume of heavy fuel oil released.

    The ESG has been calling for our bunkering trade to diversify away from fossil fuels given the very high carbon emissions attributable to Gibraltar from this practice. However, it is also the air and noise pollution, as well as environmental impacts from oil spills, which also concerns the group.



    ESG welcomes ex Friends of the Earth Juniper’s comments on Fossil Fuel Trade 13.06.23


    It was an important moment for the ESG to meet with Tony Juniper at the Aspire Conference, a major trailblazer for the environment for decades, and an inspiration for action.

    In his Chronicle interview it was heartening to hear his recommendations to Gibraltar as to the need to diversify from our trade in fossil fuels for bunkering of ships and other vehicle fuel sales. This trade accounts for approximately 90% of our overall GHG emissions total.

    This is a big issue for the group that has campaigned for years to see this major greenhouse house contributor feature far more prominently on our climate target aspirations.

    “Overall, his reflections and comments were spot on”, says a spokesperson for the ESG,  “and we hope he will continue to visit Gibraltar and hopefully see us rise to the challenges laid before us.”



  •